Google does not publish a numbered list of ranking factors. How Google Search works says relevancy is determined by hundreds of factors, which can include the searcher's location, language and device. The public record of the systems behind that is A guide to Google Search ranking systems. This page separates what that documentation confirms from claims it contradicts. It does not forecast positions or traffic.
If the process is new to you, start with what SEO is. The work you can change on a URL sits in on-page SEO, technical SEO and off-page SEO.
What Google says ranking is
Ranking systems work on the page. Site-wide signals also exist, but Google says a strong site-wide signal does not make every URL rank, and a weak one does not sink every URL. Changes are tested, and Google announces ranking updates when that is useful to creators.
Four distinctions matter before any checklist:
- Understanding systems such as BERT, RankBrain, neural matching and passage ranking match meaning. They are not settings you turn on. RankBrain can return a relevant page even when some query words are missing.
- Link systems, including PageRank, still read how pages link to each other. PageRank remains part of core ranking. Penguin, the 2012 link-spam system, was folded into core ranking in 2016.
- Quality systems favour original reporting, reliable information and high-quality reviews. The helpful-content system from 2022 became part of core ranking in March 2024.
- MUM is not used for general ranking. Google limits it to specific applications, such as some featured-snippet callouts.
Confirmed signals you can act on
| What Google documents | What it means for a page | Where it is written |
|---|---|---|
| Links and PageRank | Links still help Google judge which pages are useful. Links built to manipulate rank violate spam policy. | Ranking systems, spam policies |
| People-first content | Systems prioritise content made for people. Google says it has no preferred word count. | Helpful content |
| E-E-A-T as a concept | Experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trust are identified through many factors. E-E-A-T itself is not one ranking factor. Trust matters most. YMYL topics get more weight. | Same helpful-content page |
| Core Web Vitals | Core Web Vitals are used by ranking systems. A good report does not guarantee the top result. | Page experience |
| Query deserves freshness | Fresher results appear when the query needs them, such as a new film or a recent earthquake. Age is not a universal bonus. | Ranking systems guide |
| Original content | Original reporting is meant to outrank pages that only cite it. Canonical markup can mark the primary URL. | Ranking systems guide |
| Words in the domain | Domain words are one relevance factor. An exact-match domain does not get extra credit. | Ranking systems guide |
| Spam detection | SpamBrain and related systems deal with behaviour that violates spam policies, including keyword stuffing and link spam. | Ranking systems guide and spam policies |
Structured data is documented as a way to label what is on the page so Google can understand it and, when the page is eligible, show a rich result. It is not listed as a ranking system. Use it only when the markup matches visible content, as the technical SEO guide describes.
Myths the documentation contradicts
These claims still show up in checklists. Each one conflicts with a current Google page.
- The keywords meta tag ranks you. Google's web search does not use the keywords meta tag. The post still says that has not changed.
- You can pay for a higher organic position. How Search works says Google does not accept payment to rank pages higher. Ads are separate.
- A higher crawl rate is a ranking factor. Crawling myths says crawling is required for a page to be eligible, but crawl rate is not a ranking signal.
- Trivial edits and a new date make a page fresh. Crawling myths says quality is judged regardless of age, and date-only edits add nothing. The helpful-content guide says changing dates, or adding and removing pages just to look fresh, will not help.
- Pages closer to the homepage rank higher. A homepage link can mean more frequent crawling. Google says that is not a higher rank.
- An exact-match domain is a ranking boost. Domain words can show relevance. The exact-match system stops a query-shaped name from propping up weak content.
- Repeating the keyword is a factor. Keyword stuffing is spam: unnatural lists, city-name blocks, or a phrase repeated until it sounds wrong.
- Buying or exchanging links is normal off-page SEO. Link spam includes paid links that pass credit, excessive exchanges and keyword-rich footers. Earn mentions as the link building guide describes.
- A perfect Core Web Vitals grade wins the query. Page experience says there is no single signal. Beyond Core Web Vitals, other page-experience aspects do not directly raise rank, though they can make a page more usable. Metric definitions are in Core Web Vitals.
- E-E-A-T is a factor you add with an author box. Google says E-E-A-T itself is not a ranking factor. Rater data is not used directly in ranking. A byline shows who wrote the page. A fabricated expert bio is deception.
- Google prefers a word count. The helpful-content page says no.
- MUM ranks your site, or helpful content is still a separate penalty. MUM is not a general ranker. Helpful content joined core systems in March 2024.
Social likes, a Google Analytics bounce rate and domain-registration length are not named in the ranking-systems guide. That absence is not a denial, so this article does not list them as confirmed myths.
What to change on the site
Use the documented systems, in this order:
- Answer one query in the title, H1 and opening. That is on-page SEO and SEO content, not a density target.
- Keep the URL crawlable, indexable and honestly canonical. See technical SEO. Crawl rate is not the ranking lever.
- Hold Core Web Vitals in a good range on templates that earn impressions. Skip a perfect lab score on thin copy.
- Publish something a reader cannot get by rewriting the current results.
- Earn relevant links and drop manipulative ones. Read off-page SEO.
- Use Search Console for the queries the URL already appears for. A factor checklist cannot name the URL Google is choosing.
For map results, use the local SEO guide. This web-ranking list does not describe Google Business Profile.
Ready to Get Started?
If you want these documented signals checked against your own URLs, request an SEO audit or get a quote. Ongoing work is listed on the pricing page. We will not sell a 200-factor score Google does not publish.
Frequently asked questions
Google does not publish a complete numbered list. Its how-Search-works guide says relevancy uses hundreds of factors, which can include location, language and device. The ranking systems guide names notable systems such as PageRank, BERT, RankBrain, neural matching and spam detection.
No. Google says E-E-A-T itself is not a specific ranking factor. Its systems use many factors that can identify experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trust. Trust is the most important of those aspects.
Yes. Google says Core Web Vitals are used by its ranking systems. A good score does not guarantee a top position, and there is no single page-experience signal.
No. Google said in 2009 that web search does not use the keywords meta tag, and that Search Central post still says this has not changed.
No. Google says it does not accept payment to crawl a site more often or to rank it higher. Ads are a separate product from organic ranking.